Chapter 2
detailed summary tables of results

 2.1 List of integrals sorted by grade for each CAS
  2.1.1 Rubi
  2.1.2 Mathematica
  2.1.3 Maple
  2.1.4 Maxima
  2.1.5 FriCAS
  2.1.6 Sympy
  2.1.7 Giac
 2.2 Detailed conclusion table per each integral for all CAS systems
 2.3 Detailed conclusion table specific for Rubi results

2.1 List of integrals sorted by grade for each CAS

2.1.1 Rubi

A grade: { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 }

B grade: { }

C grade: { }

F grade: { }

2.1.2 Mathematica

A grade: { 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 }

B grade: { 3, 12, 16, 17, 18, 26, 27 }

C grade: { }

F grade: { }

2.1.3 Maple

A grade: { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 }

B grade: { 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 }

C grade: { }

F grade: { }

2.1.4 Maxima

A grade: { 1, 2, 3, 4, 22, 23, 24

B grade: { 18 }

C grade: { 19, 20, 21 }

F grade: { 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 25, 26, 27 }

2.1.5 FriCAS

A grade: { 4, 5, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 }

B grade: { 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 }

C grade: { 25, 26, 27 }

F grade: { }

2.1.6 Sympy

A grade: { }

B grade: { }

C grade: { }

F grade: { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 }

2.1.7 Giac

A grade: { 4, 6, 7, 8, 22 }

B grade: { 1, 2, 3, 5, 23 }

C grade: { 19, 20 }

F grade: { 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27 }

2.2 Detailed conclusion table per each integral for all CAS systems

Detailed conclusion table per each integral is given by table below. The elapsed time is in seconds. For failed result it is given as F(-1) if the failure was due to timeout. It is given as F(-2) if the failure was due to an exception being raised, which could indicate a bug in the system. If the failure was due to integral not being evaluated within the time limit, then it is given just an F.

In this table,the column normalized size is defined as \(\frac{\text{antiderivative leaf size}}{\text{optimal antiderivative leaf size}}\)










Problem 1 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A A B F B
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 112 112 148 129 190 602 0 474
normalized size 1 1. 1.32 1.15 1.7 5.38 0. 4.23
time (sec) N/A 0.067 3.496 0.037 1.108 0.504 0. 1.256


















Problem 2 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A A B F B
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 74 74 112 83 122 386 0 285
normalized size 1 1. 1.51 1.12 1.65 5.22 0. 3.85
time (sec) N/A 0.046 3.571 0.035 0.996 0.487 0. 1.56


















Problem 3 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A B A A B F B
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 41 41 83 47 66 216 0 143
normalized size 1 1. 2.02 1.15 1.61 5.27 0. 3.49
time (sec) N/A 0.03 0.63 0.032 0.988 0.478 0. 1.619


















Problem 4 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A A A F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 16 16 16 17 24 76 0 24
normalized size 1 1. 1. 1.06 1.5 4.75 0. 1.5
time (sec) N/A 0.012 0.008 0.013 0.976 0.469 0. 1.38


















Problem 5 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A F(-2) A F B
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 46 46 46 50 0 617 0 109
normalized size 1 1. 1. 1.09 0. 13.41 0. 2.37
time (sec) N/A 0.047 0.204 0.072 0. 0.541 0. 1.481


















Problem 6 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A F(-2) B F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 92 92 166 140 0 1165 0 189
normalized size 1 1. 1.8 1.52 0. 12.66 0. 2.05
time (sec) N/A 0.107 0.801 0.086 0. 0.596 0. 1.471


















Problem 7 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B F(-2) B F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 144 144 201 363 0 2175 0 302
normalized size 1 1. 1.4 2.52 0. 15.1 0. 2.1
time (sec) N/A 0.184 1.56 0.089 0. 0.681 0. 1.509


















Problem 8 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B F(-2) B F(-1) A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 204 204 263 737 0 3672 0 478
normalized size 1 1. 1.29 3.61 0. 18. 0. 2.34
time (sec) N/A 0.325 3.308 0.09 0. 0.805 0. 1.485


















Problem 9 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B F B F(-1) F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 167 167 246 3621 0 4761 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 1.47 21.68 0. 28.51 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.182 3.568 0.452 0. 4.117 0. 0.


















Problem 10 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B F B F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 119 119 208 1286 0 3914 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 1.75 10.81 0. 32.89 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.096 0.914 0.427 0. 1.625 0. 0.


















Problem 11 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B F(-2) B F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 81 81 149 419 0 3241 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 1.84 5.17 0. 40.01 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.05 0.233 0.398 0. 1.072 0. 0.


















Problem 12 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A B B F(-2) B F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 39 40 98 182 0 995 0 0
normalized size 1 1.03 2.51 4.67 0. 25.51 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.036 0.145 0.371 0. 0.686 0. 0.


















Problem 13 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B F(-2) B F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 77 77 146 648 0 1528 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 1.9 8.42 0. 19.84 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.049 0.351 0.38 0. 0.917 0. 0.


















Problem 14 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B F(-2) B F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 126 126 173 2702 0 2234 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 1.37 21.44 0. 17.73 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.1 1.679 0.445 0. 2.151 0. 0.


















Problem 15 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B F(-2) B F(-1) F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 180 180 231 4815 0 3267 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 1.28 26.75 0. 18.15 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.176 1.426 0.561 0. 6.97 0. 0.


















Problem 16 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A B B F B F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 44 44 94 312 0 599 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 2.14 7.09 0. 13.61 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.039 0.167 0.261 0. 0.529 0. 0.


















Problem 17 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A B B F B F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 28 28 68 166 0 500 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 2.43 5.93 0. 17.86 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.021 0.056 0.184 0. 0.516 0. 0.


















Problem 18 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A B B B B F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 16 16 49 72 524 203 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 3.06 4.5 32.75 12.69 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.017 0.051 0.143 1.871 0.494 0. 0.


















Problem 19 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B C A F C
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 33 33 26 91 28 36 0 63
normalized size 1 1. 0.79 2.76 0.85 1.09 0. 1.91
time (sec) N/A 0.027 0.017 0.125 1.517 0.487 0. 2.118


















Problem 20 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B C A F C
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 16 16 16 46 20 36 0 65
normalized size 1 1. 1. 2.88 1.25 2.25 0. 4.06
time (sec) N/A 0.028 0.006 0.125 1.513 0.489 0. 1.638


















Problem 21 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B C A F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 17 17 17 67 12 36 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 1. 3.94 0.71 2.12 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.024 0.009 0.162 1.496 0.488 0. 0.


















Problem 22 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B A A F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 30 30 24 92 28 80 0 63
normalized size 1 1. 0.8 3.07 0.93 2.67 0. 2.1
time (sec) N/A 0.022 0.014 0.099 1.544 0.488 0. 1.617


















Problem 23 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B A A F B
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 14 14 14 51 18 24 0 59
normalized size 1 1. 1. 3.64 1.29 1.71 0. 4.21
time (sec) N/A 0.024 0.006 0.137 1.698 0.486 0. 1.391


















Problem 24 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B A A F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 15 15 15 68 12 19 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 1. 4.53 0.8 1.27 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.019 0.009 0.134 1.687 0.486 0. 0.


















Problem 25 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B F C F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 55 55 96 268 0 714 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 1.75 4.87 0. 12.98 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.046 0.112 0.254 0. 0.5 0. 0.


















Problem 26 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A B B F C F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 33 33 70 139 0 387 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 2.12 4.21 0. 11.73 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.025 0.038 0.187 0. 0.475 0. 0.


















Problem 27 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A B B F C F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 18 18 51 75 0 211 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 2.83 4.17 0. 11.72 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.02 0.031 0.157 0. 0.467 0. 0.









2.3 Detailed conclusion table specific for Rubi results

The following table is specific to Rubi. It gives additional statistics for each integral. the column steps is the number of steps used by Rubi to obtain the antiderivative. The rules column is the number of unique rules used. The integrand size column is the leaf size of the integrand. Finally the ratio \(\frac{\text{number of rules}}{\text{integrand size}}\) is given. The larger this ratio is, the harder the integral was to solve. In this test, problem number [16] had the largest ratio of [ 0.6 ]

Table 2.1Rubi specific breakdown of results for each integral














# grade
number of
steps
used
number of
unique
rules
normalized
antiderivative
leaf size
integrand
leaf size
\(\frac{\text{number of rules}}{\text{integrand leaf size}}\)







1 A 4 3 1. 14 0.214







2 A 4 3 1. 14 0.214







3 A 4 3 1. 14 0.214







4 A 3 2 1. 12 0.167







5 A 3 3 1. 14 0.214







6 A 5 5 1. 14 0.357







7 A 6 6 1. 14 0.429







8 A 7 6 1. 14 0.429







9 A 8 8 1. 16 0.5







10 A 7 7 1. 16 0.438







11 A 6 6 1. 16 0.375







12 A 3 3 1.03 16 0.188







13 A 4 4 1. 16 0.25







14 A 6 6 1. 16 0.375







15 A 7 6 1. 16 0.375







16 A 6 6 1. 10 0.6







17 A 5 5 1. 10 0.5







18 A 3 3 1. 10 0.3







19 A 4 4 1. 12 0.333







20 A 3 3 1. 12 0.25







21 A 3 3 1. 12 0.25







22 A 4 4 1. 10 0.4







23 A 3 3 1. 10 0.3







24 A 3 3 1. 10 0.3







25 A 7 7 1. 12 0.583







26 A 6 6 1. 12 0.5







27 A 3 3 1. 12 0.25